Riding the Cybersecurity Wave: Supply Chain Networks
Welcome to the intricate world of supply chain management and networks, where a multitude of organizations come together in a symphony of operations...
This is a quick deep dive into one of the NCSC cyber security culture principles, designed to help you understand what it actually means in plain English, why it matters in real organizations, and how to spot it in your own world.
If you’re looking for the bigger picture on NCSC culture and how to turn these principles into a real program, you might also like:
Our overview of the NCSC cyber security culture principles and why they matter
How to operationalize the NCSC culture agenda step by step
How to build a 12-month NCSC-aligned cyber security culture roadmap
Measuring cyber security culture with NCSC-aligned metrics that actually work
The NCSC Cyber Culture FAQ: 21 Questions Answered
Use this post to get your head around this principle quickly, then jump into the longer guides when you’re ready to design or evolve your culture program.
The third principle is about whether your organization actually gets smarter over time. NCSC’s culture work emphasizes that cyber security culture should support learning from incidents, near misses, and change, and turning that learning into updated processes, controls, and behaviors. NCSC
The “beef” here is that many organizations say they do lessons learned, but nothing visibly changes. Staff see the same patterns repeat, often dressed up in new slide decks, and quietly conclude, “nothing ever really moves.” NCSC includes this principle because a culture that can’t adapt will be permanently behind attackers and technology—especially with shifts like cloud, SaaS, and GenAI. Learning and adaptation is the difference between “we logged it” and “we’ll never be burned by that in the same way again.”
The learn and adapt principle is about whether your organization can:
Spot patterns in incidents, near misses, and change
Turn those patterns into updates to process, training, and tools
Do that in weeks and months, not every five years
It’s basically: “Do we get smarter, or just repeat ourselves with nicer slides?”
When you don’t learn:
The same incident story keeps reappearing with different names.
Staff believe “nothing changes” after reviews.
People stop bothering to provide feedback.
Your culture quietly decides:
“Incidents are just noise to endure, not something we grow from.”
Ask:
Can we point to 3 concrete changes we made because of past incidents?
Do staff see a visible link between their feedback and anything actually changing?
When new tech (like GenAI) appears, do we adapt quickly, or sit in “draft policy” for a year?
If you’re drawing blanks, your learning loops are too slow.
For the next incident or near miss, publish a short “we changed X because we learned Y” note.
Turn one long, dusty “lessons learned” report into three practical tweaks to tools, process, or guidance.
Add a simple “what did we learn?” and “what did we change?” line into existing review forms.
We help you build a culture where:
Stories about incidents are turned into short, human content
Lessons show up in characters, narratives, and micro-learning
Your NCSC-aligned roadmap is clearly about experimentation and iteration, not a static document
Welcome to the intricate world of supply chain management and networks, where a multitude of organizations come together in a symphony of operations...
4 min read
The New Frontline in Cybersecurity
4 min read
Artificial Intelligence is not a future threat. It’s a present accelerant. From phishing emails that mimic your CEO’s tone to malicious code written...
7 min read
Subscribe to our newsletters for the latest news and insights.
Stay updated with best practices to enhance your workforce.
Get the latest on strategic risk for Executives and Managers.