What is a malicious insider?

A malicious insider is someone with legitimate access to an organisation’s systems, data or processes—such as an employee, contractor or partner—who intentionally abuses that access for personal gain or to cause harm. Unlike external attackers, malicious insiders already sit inside your defences, with knowledge of how things really work.

How does AI change malicious insider risk?

AI amplifies malicious insider risk by giving insiders more powerful tools for phishing, fraud, data discovery and evasion. They can use generative AI to craft highly convincing messages, write or refine scripts that bypass controls, generate synthetic media and fake artefacts, and more quickly locate and extract sensitive data across AI and data platforms.

What is the difference between malicious insiders and accidental insiders?

Malicious insiders intentionally abuse access to cause harm or steal value. Accidental insiders are well-intentioned people who create risk by mistake—for example by pasting sensitive data into public AI tools, misconfiguring AI workflows or over-trusting AI-generated output. Both live inside the Psychological Perimeter and both must be addressed in Human Risk Management Programs.

Why are malicious insiders so dangerous in an AI-enabled organisation?

Malicious insiders combine three dangerous elements: legitimate access, deep knowledge of systems and processes, and now AI tools that help them move faster and hide better. They can operate from within your Psychological Perimeter, using their understanding of identity, culture and workflows to evade traditional perimeter-focused controls.

How can organisations detect and manage malicious insider risk in the age of AI?

Managing malicious insider risk in an AI-enabled world requires blending technical and human approaches. That includes identity and access analytics, data security and AI usage telemetry, combined with behavioural and cultural insight into pressure, incentives and grievances. Insider risk should be integrated into Human Risk Management Programs, AI governance, HR, legal and ethics, not treated as a standalone logging problem.

How does insider risk connect to the Psychological Perimeter and Human OS?

Insider risk lives inside the Psychological Perimeter, where identity, access, cognition and culture intersect. The Human OS—the organisation’s real norms, stories and behaviours—shapes whether people escalate concerns, misuse access, hide mistakes or feel pressured into bad decisions. Strengthening culture and Human Risk Management is essential to reducing both malicious and accidental insider risk in an AI-enabled organisation.

Malicious Insiders in an AI-Enabled World

“Insider threat” isn’t new. But AI changes what insiders—especially malicious ones—can do.

A malicious insider is someone with legitimate access who intentionally abuses it: an employee, contractor or partner who uses their position to steal, sabotage or exploit.

In an AI-enabled environment, that person doesn’t just have access. They have amplifiers.

Why malicious insiders are so dangerous

Malicious insiders sit at a perfect intersection:

They know your systems, processes and people
They have legitimate credentials, devices and routes in
They understand where sensitive data lives and how work really gets done

Even before AI, insider incidents at tech companies, financial institutions and cloud providers regularly racked up multi-million-dollar costs in remediation, fines and lost trust.

How AI changes the game for insiders

AI gives malicious insiders:

Content generation at scale – realistic phishing, fraud and social engineering campaigns that abuse insider knowledge
Code and script assistance – help writing evasive tools or prompts to bypass controls
Synthetic media tools – deepfakes and fake artifacts (emails, screenshots, documents) that complicate investigations
Data discovery support – faster ways to locate, classify and exfiltrate sensitive information across AI and data platforms

The same Psychological Perimeter that enables legitimate work—identity, context, cognition—can now be turned inward with more power and subtlety.

Don’t forget accidental insiders

Not all insider risk is malicious. Far more often, well-intentioned people do risky things:

Pasting sensitive data into public AI tools
Relying on AI-generated content in contracts or code without review
Using unapproved plugins or shadow AI to “get the job done”

These accidental insiders live squarely inside your Psychological Perimeter. The problem isn’t that they’re bad actors; it’s that the culture, workflows and AI guidance around them are underdeveloped.

Managing insider risk in the AI era

To manage malicious and accidental insiders, especially with AI in the mix, you need to:

Combine technical monitoring (identity analytics, data security, AI telemetry) with human insight (pressures, norms, grievances)
Integrate insider risk into your Human Risk Management Programs
Recognize that insider risk is as much cultural as it is technical

For a deeper dive into how insiders fit into the broader Psychological Perimeter and AI workforce risk, see:

“The Psychological Perimeter: Human Risk, AI, and the New Frontline of Cybersecurity.”
“AI Workforce Risk: The Problem You’ll Only See When It’s Too Late.”
Malicious Insiders & the Google AI Case- What You Need to Do To Mitigate Insider Threats Through Positive Cyber Culture

More from the Trenches!

AI, Automation, and the Next Generation of Insider Threats

Culture » AI » Cyber Risk Quantification »

We've Got You Covered!

Subscribe to our newsletters for the latest news and insights.